CONTACT US Alison Stevens-alison.stevens44@gmail.com Florence Bellone flobellone@ntlworld.com Trevor Jones parentsagainstinjustice@hotmail.co,uk Richard Roper richard_roper@yahoo.com PAIN mobile number for advice 07869799107. We also have a new Advocate in the London area as well
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DR SQUIER
MY CASE ON SCRIB
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582129/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582176/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582213/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582392/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582423/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582452/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582462/MY-CASE
https://www.scribd.com/doc/127582488/MY-CASE
Adoption and Care Planning (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018
Adoption and Care Planning (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2018
THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD NEVER AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER OUT OF DURESS BY A SOCIAL WORKER
BY AGREEING TO A SECTION ORDER,YOU WILL BE PLACING YOUR CHILD INTO VOLUNTARY CARE AND FACE LOOSING YOUR BABY TO FORCED ADOPTION
Do not ever agree to sign a section 20 Order out of duress by a Social Worker.
Not only will you be agreeing to Put your Child into voluntary Care, but you will not be entitled to Public Funded Legal Aid at this time.
The Social Worker more than often will say, if you do not agree to sign a section 20 Order, will will go for an Emergency Protection Order.
If they mention an Emergency Protection Order, you will need to act very quickly, and get a Children's Panel Solicitor straight away.
Solicitors that represent PAIN Service Users have been very successful in the past in preventing the granting of an Emergency Protection Order.
Social Workers will not tell you that you can try and discharge the EPO, within 72 hours.
The Local Authority can sit on this order for quite a few weeks,AND AS I HAVE ALREADY STATED YOU WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO PUBLIC FUNDED LEGAL AID AT THIS TIME.
If you receive a Pre Proceedings letter through the post, you must take this letter straight to a specialized Children's Panel Solicitor.
The letter will state that they are considering going for Care Proceedings, and there will be a Pre Proceedings Meeting.
At any Pre Proceedings Meeting they do not always instigate Care Proceedings.
There is sometimes an Agreement contract drawn up, for you as Parents to follow the stipulations written to in the Contract.
If you breach the Agreement, then there is a high expectation that the LA will in most cases instigate Care Proceedings.
When the LA instigate Care Proceedings, and if they go for an Emergency Protection Order, this is when Non Means Tested Public Funded Legal Aid is granted.
With the Governments CHANGE OF DIRECTION FOSTER TILL YOU ADOPT COMING INTO FORCE THREE YEARS AGO, which means Foster Carers are brought in at the early stages of Care Proceedings , or Babies are allocated to Foster Carers before they are even born, this means in a lot of Cases, a Baby will be taken from His or Her Birth Parents within minutes or a few hours after birth, via an Emergency Protection Order.
TO PUT THIS IN THE PROPER TERMS,THE PROSPECTIVE ADOPTERS WILL SEE THE BABY MORE OR LESS WITHIN A FEW HOURS OF BIRTH.
This will also be breaching the Kincare Clause by placing a Child with an immediate Family Member such as Grandparents, Aunties, Uncles, before foster care is explored.
Local Authority's have a mandatory obligation to consider using the Kincare Clause, before a Child is placed into Care, and placed with Foster Carers.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/10/babies-at-risk-of-a....
DO NOT AGREE TO SIGN A SECTION 20 ORDER, YOUR LEGAL AID WILL NOT BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME.
Raising the minimum age for marriage and civil partnerships
Raising the minimum age for marriage and civil partnerships
-
Court of Appeal allows appeal over placement order after judicial analysis "fell significantly short" https://www.bailii.org/ew/...
-
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
-
https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/cohabitating-couples-t...
Michael D Innis Shaken Baby Syndrome
I am a pathologist and a hematologist. My qualifications are MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine) University of Madras 1942; DTM&H (Diploma of Tropical Medicine) University of Liverpool; FRCPA (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1960 (Australia); FRCPath (Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) 1972 (United Kingdom). I have substantial experience in hematology and have had experience in interpreting laboratory results for over 30 years. I have been a part time lecturer in Medicine at the University of Queensland and have instructed candidates appearing for Fellowship of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.
[2015 Oct] Shaken Baby Syndrome or Death by Vaccine? Doctor Speaks Out…by Chri...
[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis
[pdf] Vaccines, Apparent Life-Threatening Events, Barlow's Disease,...
[pdf] Vitamin K deficiency disease by Michael Innis MBBS
[2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?
[March 2008 SBS letter] Child Health Safety - BMJ Stifles Debate
[BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)
[BMJ 22 March 2002] Misdiagnosis of “Shaken Baby Syndrome” by Michael D Innis
Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pitfalls in Diagnosis and Demographics By F. ...
Innis, SM. The role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in the developing brain. Devel Neuroscience, 2000; 22(5-6):4740480.
Quotes
My paper on “Coagulopathy mistaken for Shaken Baby Syndrome” was rejected – it recorded the case of a child given six vaccines on the same day and who was ill with fever, irritability and diarrhoea the next day and was dead three weeks later. Death was certified to be due to the Shaken Baby Syndrome on the evidence of Pathologists, Paediatricians and Radiologists when all the haematological and biochemical evidence clearly indicated death was due to a coagulopathy following hepatic insufficiency and malnutrition. [BMJ Aug 2002] History repeats itself (shaken baby syndrome)
[2010 March Letter] MMR Toxicity Explained by Michael D Innis The truth is it is harming the children because as Wakefield and his colleagues have shown, some ingredient in the vaccine causes methymalonic acidaemia followed by cobalamine deficiency and consequently neurological lesions in genetically susceptible children. The government is blind to this and one way out of this dilemma it seems is for doctors to forgo the five pieces of silver and refuse to vaccinate children on the grounds that the oath they have sworn, "first do no harm" forbids such an action.
In April 2004, Michael D. Innis, the renowned Australian pathologist-hematologist and an expert on SBS, wrote in a communication to the British Medical Journal (BMJ): ". in spite of being repeatedlychallenged to document a single authenticated case of shaken baby syndrome or shaking/impact Injury, no one has been able to do so. All they are required to do to convince judges, juries, and those of us who regard the condition as a spurious diagnosis, is present a case which:
1. was not vaccinated within 21 days of the onset of symptoms;
2. was shown to have a normal coagulation/hemostatic system;
3. had no evidence of malnutrition, and was not artificial fed or premature, since these factors predispose to fractures .
If the numerous pediatricians, ophthalmologists, radiologists and pathologists, who have given evidence in courts in the U.K., U.S. and Australia, are unable to document a single properly investigated case,there is good reason to abandon the diagnosis." Shaken Baby Syndrome And Multiple Vaccinations: An Investigation By Red Flags Columnist, F. Edward Yazbak, MD, FAAP
They will have successfully demolished my explanation if they can document a single case of Shaken Baby Syndrome or “inflicted shaking/impact injury” (as they prefer to call it), which occurred outside the 21-day period and in which a disorder of haemostasis, nutrition, or liver disease was convincingly excluded.
I repeat, the diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome or inflicted shaking/impact injury is a proven figment of the imagination of some in the medical profession and should be relegated to the scrap heap of history before it causes any more shame to the profession and disaster to innocent families. Source
To prevent death following vaccination Alan Clemetson's opinion is; "There are very rare instances of severe reactions or even death following the usual infant inoculations. Although such events are rare, we need to do all we can to prevent them.
Animal observations have shown that the blood histamine concentration is increased following the injection of vaccines or toxoids and this is most likely responsible for the problems.
Vitamin C supplementation is now known to reduce the blood histamine levels; it also reduces the mortality rates following inoculations, both in animals and in man.
It is suggested that inoculations should not be given to severely debilitated infants and that supplementary vitamin C should be given in orange juice, before inoculation, to any infant with coryza, and also to any infant or adult who is to receive an unduly large number of inoculations at one time.
Moreover, vitamin C should be given by injection whenever convulsions or other untoward events occur within a day or two after vaccination or inoculation."[1] Why not try Clemetson's suggestions - out of curiosity? ----Michael D Innis, [2008] Rapid Responses to Does cot death still exist?
No comments:
Post a Comment